Phase: |
Theme |
Theme: | Biomass (T01) |
Status: | Active |
Start Date: | 2023-04-01 |
End Date: | 2026-03-31 |
Principal Investigator |
Zhong, Lexuan |
Project Overview
Thermal energy storage is an effective means to enhance energy efficiency in buildings, reducing energy consumption and decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. Phase change materials (PCMs) absorb or release large amounts of heat at a constant temperature while changing phases. When PCMs are at their phase-transitioning temperature, adding or removing heat results in no temperature change. This project will convert biomass wastes into specialty fatty acids and embed these into construction materials. Incorporating PCMs with a carefully selected melting point in buildings allows providing thermal comfort while reducing energy bills and environmental impacts. Biomass-derived PCMs will be embedded into medium density fibreboards (MDF) and particle boards produced from straw. This technology valorizes currently underutilized biomass residues, opens new opportunities for employment in the bioindustrial sector and green construction, and directly enhances the energy efficiency of buildings.
Outputs
Title |
Category |
Date |
Authors |
Optimizing phase change material integration in residential building envelopes for year-round energy efficiency in cold climatesPhase Change Materials (PCMs) hold significant potential for improving traditional building envelopes by mitigating indoor temperature fluctuations and reducing energy demands through their Thermal Energy Storage (TES) properties. A crucial objective in designing PCMs-enhanced building envelopes is to optimize their energy-saving performance under varying conditions. This simulation study focuses on a residential building in Alberta, Canada, analyzing both steady (normal) and intermittent (night) operation schedules. The aim is to identify PCM specifications that maximize year-round energy-saving. The two main variables of PCM specifications investigated are the midpoint melting temperature (T_mid) and the installation position (PCM layer on the interior or exterior side of the insulation layer). Preliminary simulations show that PCMs installed in the interior outperform those installed in exterior locations. If true, the optimization problem is simplified to a one-dimensional model, with T_mid being the continuous variable optimized to minimize cooling, heating, and total energy demand on an annual basis, respectively. The co-simulation of EnergyPlus and GenOpt platforms is employed for optimization. Results indicate that the PCM configuration with the optimal midpoint melting temperature T_mid resulted in total energy-saving of 6.65% at 21.71℃ for the steady schedule and 5.21% at 22.04℃ for the intermittent schedule. And the ratio of energy-saving for cooling was higher under intermittent operation (28.42% at 23.27℃) than under steady operation (22.38% at 22.76℃). Relatively satisfactory heating or cooling energy-saving was achieved when T_mid was set within ±0.5℃ of the heating setpoint or 1 ~ 2℃ below the cooling setpoint, respectively. For residential buildings in cold climates, the melting heat of PCMs primarily originates from indoor sources rather than outdoors. While the energy savings from PCMs during the winter are modest, their ability to mitigate indoor temperature fluctuations is significantly enhanced under intermittent operations, showing promise in enhancing thermal comfort and improving building energy flexibility. University of Alberta | Publication | 2025-03-17 | Jie Ren, Zhong, L. |
Improving building energy performance with phase change materials: a case study in Alberta for energy-savings University of Alberta | Publication | 2024-06-05 | "Jie Ren", Zhong, L. |